Books of 2014: Top Ten
So finally, we count down my top 10 books of the year. The
good news is that they’re from a variety of sources and were read for a variety
of reasons – some, in fact, for no apparent reason. With no further Apu, I’ll
kick off with my number 10…
#BooksReadForAbsolutelyNoReason
Yep, this one I can’t really remember the reason. I believe
it came up on a list of environmental dystopian fiction and it sounded
interesting, so it went on my radar.
What a gorgeous book it is. I’m not sure what it is about
English-language writers of Asian heritage (I’m drawing the comparison here
with Ishiguro), but they really have a gift for exposing the beauty of our
language.
Lee had me hooked from page one, writing of a missing young
woman who, before her disappearance, occupied herself as a diver for
multi-coloured fish in a speculative future version of Baltimore, where an
unspecified global disaster (yes, familiar territory) has depleted resources
and forced people to live in gated communities. An elite few youngsters are
chosen each year to venture into the higher-status communities, and until her
disappearance, our protagonist Fan was touted to be such a chosen one.
Lee plays quite an inventive game with the narrative voice
here: the unidentified narrator is a member of the community left heartbroken
and frightened by Fan’s disappearance, while simultaneously having the
omniscience of hindsight to be able to narrate Fan’s own adventures.
Apart from the voice, the genre is also inventively hard to
pin down: while it’s set in a dystopian world, the plot follows more of a picaresque structure, as Fan encounters
strange characters and creatures living in a variety of hardships in this
unhinged universe.
Throughout the book I had in my head that the title is taken
from The Tempest. It’s actually from Julius Caesar, but it's almost disappointing to learn that, because the book conjures up
a similar vision to The Tempest of nature’s chaos and man’s impotence in the face of its raw
elements. This is a theme that, without realising, I seem to respond to very
strongly (think Deliverance and its
high position last year), but above all this book is just exquisitely written
even in the face of its own dark cynicism.
#BookGroupReading
So I’m using the hashtag #BookGroupReading here, but I think
the implication of that particular hashtag is that somebody else is responsible
for my choices – thereby distancing myself from really poor examples of
literature like, say, Michelle De Kretser. But Inherent Vice was, naturally, my own choice for the group, and so
it might technically be more fitted to #BooksReadForAbsolutelyNoReason except
that Pynchon is a very, very good reason to read anything.
So you might think I’m trying to justify inflicting Pynchon
on my friends by placing it in such an exalted position in the top 10, but I
did genuinely enjoy this book.
It’s got all of the Pynchon hallmarks: a convoluted plot
that gets increasingly more convoluted as we go on; stoners and hippies; a
1960s/70s backdrop; and a large cast of idiosyncratic misfits caught in a web
of post-modern silliness.
Although this is regarded by some as Pynchon’s first foray
into genre fiction (and the soon-to-be-released film adaptation being
coincidentally regarded as PT Anderson’s first foray into the same), there are
many echoes of his previous work throughout: the relationship between Doc Sportello and the LAPD’s Bigfoot Bjornsen is
reminiscent of the relationship between Zoyd and Brock in Vineland, while Doc’s own noirish investigation into the underworld
conjures up Tyrone’s search for the rocket and his nemesis in Gravity’s Rainbow.
But despite featuring all the Pynchon inaccessibility, this
is probably his most readable work. Complex though it is, it makes no attempt
to philosophise or even particularly satirise. It’s just the entertaining
rollercoaster of a Pynchon plot, stripped back to just the action. Great fun.
#BooksReadForAbsolutelyNoReason
For whatever reason, I seem to have gotten myself a
reputation that I don’t like sci-fi. It may just be me projecting these days
(especially given the savaging I’ve given things like Ubik on this blog), but while I tend to steer clear of the sci-fi
section in most bookshops – which don’t exist anymore anyway – there are
certainly some fantastic examples of the sci-fi canon that really engage me.
This is one of them.
I think what makes books such as this more than just pulp
genre fiction is when they are able to ground their speculations in a relatable
experience. Therefore cyberpunk fantasies like Snow Crash and Neuromancer
do nothing for me, because their worlds are so far removed from my own and the
kinetic action so intrinsic that the reading experience seems inadequate and I
find myself just wishing to see it in cinematic form.
What Ender’s Game
brings us is an elite, but otherwise ordinary boy protagonist who is touted as
the saviour of human existence. High stakes, yes? But being still in his
formative years, Andrew “Ender” Wiggin is forced to undergo a process of
rigorous conditioning to prepare himself for earth’s final battle against the
combative enemy, the “buggers”.
What ensues is a very complex psychological game whereby the
commanders of the training school isolate Ender from his compatriots before
slowly building him up as a resilient troop and, following this, a leader. The struggles
that he is forced to endure are what drives the story forward, while his
separation from his sister and the tumultuous relationship with his older
brother form the emotional core of the story.
Beyond just having a relatable heart, though, Ender’s Game is also strikingly
inventive, relating a nightmarish universe of territorial, life-or-death
conflict with plenty of entertaining action that is both conceivable and
intriguing. Card’s skill as a writer is a big part of the stimulating nature of
this story, and he does the world of genre fiction a huge service with this
masterpiece.
#BookerPrizeWinners
Like Pynchon, Ian McEwan has gained himself a comfortable
little camping ground near the top of my lists. With this, his 1998 Booker
Prize winner, he has actually stepped closer to the summit than he got with Atonement last year.
Amsterdam is
really a fascinating read – fascinating because it is deceptively light in
tone, but also because it presents us with a mind-bending moral dilemma. While
the story at its centre is of a tumultuous friendship between the composer
Clive and the newspaper editor Vernon, the ambivalence of Clive’s story seems
to be at the crux of the narrative.
While Clive is walking in the Lake District struggling to
find inspiration for an upcoming commission, he overhears a violent argument
between a man and a woman at the very time when he is struck by his musical
epiphany, and rather than intervene he chooses to hide and commit the musical
theme to writing.
The opposition between action and inaction, high art and
human experience, is what dwells at the bottom of this particular powder keg,
and as it’s a McEwan novel, you know that shit’s ‘bout to explode with
devastating ferocity.
However, the big surprise here is that McEwan - despite his
obvious violent hatred and disdain for all of humanity – doesn’t take us in the
dark directions that other works of his have, but lets the action play out in
the form of a farcical, actually amusing, manner. But this is all done without
any uncharacteristic levity; hiding behind it all is a classically unsettling
rant about the dark side of human nature and our bottomless capacity for anger.
#BookerPrizeWinners #AustralianBooks
Boy, talk about defiance of expectations. For a long time –
i.e. pretty much since it came out – I looked on The True History of the Kelly Gang as the embodiment of everything
that was wrong with Australian literature. It was a contrived attempt at making
something bigger out of our very short and otherwise uninteresting history,
which bored me at school. Also, fuck Peter Carey. That was my well-formed, rational opinion without reading a single word. And it was with an immense
shoulder-slumped reluctance that I picked this book off the library shelf
knowing that, if I were to make any concerted effort at reading all the Booker
winners, I’d have to succumb to this at some point.
Reader, I loved it. Honestly, I was shocked about a hundred
pages in to find that not only was I engrossed in the story but that I was
heavily anticipating picking it up again each time I put it down. Even knowing
the basic direction the story was going, I was captivated by Ned Kelly’s
character, his voice, and above all, his mythology.
That is what Peter Carey is doing in this book: he’s taking
an item of Australian folklore and singing new life into it, but at the same
time he’s making the short and otherwise uninteresting history of Australia
suddenly interesting.
Naturally, being a fan of the western genre, there’s a
certain appeal to me in stories like this: frontiersman struggling to control the land and its elements in unfamiliar territory, while a frontier law – whose authority in
practice is questionable - is in operation to the detriment of those renegades
who try to forge their own identity.
Singlehandedly, with one fell, heartfelt swoop of a novel,
Carey managed to reignite my flagging interest in Australian folklore,
literature and even to some extent, culture. I don’t think I would have picked
up the excellent The Secret River if
not for my enjoyment of this book, so for that and whatever else is out there,
I thank him.
#BookGroupReading
It’s probably a surprise to see this book up so high, for
those in the know. Not only did I deplore this book’s forerunner for the Miles
Franklin award, but this book has actual sheep shearing scenes in it. Given all my ranting about how Australian
literature is nothing but cattle and paddocks, I wouldn't have expected myself that a sheep-shearing book would crack my top 5.
The fact is this book, chosen by Catie for our book group
reading halfway through the year, was an incredibly satisfying and inventive
read.
It’s devious, in the way Wyld weaves the story in two
different threads: the present tense moves forward, while the flashbacks into
the past leap backwards each time - a la Memento - to arrive progressively back at the origin of the story. It took me a long time
to realise that was happening as each flashback brought us eventually back to the
beginning of the previous one.
The writing is also beautifully haunting, but the winner
here is purely the ingenuity of the story, and the way in which it cloaks
everything in intriguing mystery before slowly but flamboyantly revealing the
dark secret.
It raises the question as to whether I would have thought so
highly of this book if not for the way it was structured. I would have to say
probably not, but if it weren’t for the structure this would be a completely
different book, and as it stands it’s a thoroughly gripping, clever read.
#BookerPrizeWinners
So we return to another real mainstay of the top ten,
yanking Ishiguro back from the disappointment of When we were Orphans and back where he belongs.
This doesn’t have the devious power of Never Let Me Go: in many ways it’s a fairly staid and flat
narrative, but it is a heart-rendingly beautiful one, dripping throughout with
Ishiguro’s pure prosaic charm and bursting with flashes of humour and irony.
Telling the below-stairs story of an English country house
in the period leading up to World War II, The
Remains of the Day channels the nostalgia of Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited while also introducing the captivating and
unheard voice of the butler of the household, Stevens. It's a very interesting device to tell the whole story through his eyes as he is intimately acquainted with his gentry employer but also far enough removed to dissect it all with a critical eye.
Similarly to Never Let
Me Go, while the story and the characters were interesting, deep and
well-painted, the real winner of the reading experience is just the fluid and
languid tones of Ishiguro’s prose. As I said with Chang-Rae Lee, Ishiguro has a
gift for unlocking the hidden beauty of the English language and it’s an utter
joy to experience.
One additional note: I mentioned in my write-up of Graham Swift’s
Last Orders of how the casting of the
film adaptation seemed fine, with the film unseen. I also haven’t seen the
Merchant Ivory film adaptation of this novel, but it didn’t take me very long
in reading this book to recognise that the character of the housekeeper Miss
Kenton could be played by none other than the inimitable Emma Thompson. Frankly
if there has ever been a character more perfectly written for an actor, or an
actor more perfectly suited to a character than Miss Kenton and Emma Thompson, I haven’t found them. Everything about her character in the book – the
stiff-upper-lip, well-mannered, charming and devilishly cheeky voice and speech
– it’s Emma Thompson to a T. I was relieved to look it up and ascertain that
they had indeed made the only sensible casting decision, and while I’m
disappointed to realise that Thompson lost the Oscar that year to Holly Hunter,
it’s perhaps not so much a stretch for her to play such a charming character.
#BooksReadForAbsolutelyNoReason
Yes, this book was foreshadowed in my 20-11 post when I
discussed Robbins’ other book, Still Life
with Woodpecker, and I mentioned how much more I enjoyed this first taste
of his work.
It is what it is. You are what you it. There are no
mistakes.
Thus goes the mantra of this book and of the line of
half-badgerish creature princesses that this story narrates. It’s a very
typical bit of Robbins nonsense, whose slight divergence from coherence excites
my imagination and again, celebrates the same spirit that I have always engendered in my own writing.
There’s not a great deal more that I can add to what I wrote
about Robbins earlier, specific to this book. As I said in that review, I found
this book an utter, silly delight. Robbins manages to slip in some subtly wrought digs at the post-Vietnam
war era and America’s transition to modern politics in the shadow of 9/11. The writing is inventive and surprising at every turn, the story is offbeat and exciting, yet also surprisingly moving.
At its surface though, Villa
Incognito worked for me because I found it very, very funny. While I think
there’s an extremely laddish quality to his writing, I find his flights of
fancy and esoteric style hit their mark in this book every time. Of all the
books on this list that I would consider re-reading, this is the one I believe
I would enjoy revisiting the most.
#BookGroupReading #BookerPrizeWinners
So I’m stretching to use the #BookerPrizeWinners hashtag
here because, although this is a Booker winner, I read it purely because it was
selected as our first book group option this year, and if anything my enjoyment
of this book probably inspired my opting for Booker winners as a potential
reading challenge for the year.
There’s naturally been a lot written and talked about this
book throughout this year, and many people I know have actually struggled with
it, in particular the seemingly endless first chapter that takes up nearly
(equal to? More than?) half the entire book and skips confusingly through a
monstrous cast of characters.
The only thing I can say is: use the list of characters at
the front of the book unabashedly, and keep going with it, because my god does
it pay off. Catton is a master of Chekhov’s gun, with every single character
and every single line of dialogue being deliberately employed to the attainment of a final goal, and by the time
you’re able to wrap your head around the incredibly complex plot, everything
starts to make sense.
The second chapter of the book, that consists of a courtroom
trial sequence, is the most immersive and transporting bit of writing that I’ve
experienced since the final chapter of Infinite
Jest (high praise from me indeed). I found myself almost missing my train
stop for the days when I was reading it because from the moment I sat down I
was completely lost in the action.
I have to admit this book did have a weakness for me (and
this provided the only disagreement in the circlejerk of admiration that our
book group meeting turned into), which is that the chapters getting
progressively shorter towards the end (in a rhythm supposed to mimic a waning
moon) brought me a little out of the immersive story, and I couldn’t help but
feel the author’s unnecessary interference in the world I was enjoying. It’s a
clever device well used, but it just lifted the veil uncomfortably from my
eyes, and let this otherwise unparalleled masterpiece fall shy of the
completely engrossing…
#BookerPrizeWinners
I don’t think anybody would have been able to predict what
my number one book was this year. And, to be honest, despite my feeling during
and after my reading of this book that it was a firm contender for the top
spot, the race this year was a lot tighter than in previous years where Infinite Jest and Gone with the Wind were miles ahead of their competitors.
So why does Iris Murdoch’s 1978 Booker Winner find itself above so much other mastery?
As I hinted to just then, I just found the story utterly
compelling from start to finish. It also strikes me, looking at it and the list
as a whole, that this features a pastiche of elements that I enjoyed in other works. The
central character of retired theatre director Charles Arrowby occupies a seaside
hermitage similar to Kerewin in The Bone
People, and as I said in my discussion of the 2005 winner The Sea, has a similar feeling of
longing nostalgia to Banville’s. But there are a couple of elements that raise
this well above the standard fare.
Firstly, this is delightfully cynical, but also cynical in a
really unsettling way. The story it tells of nostalgic love and uncompromising
obsession has this strange evocation of so many other lovesick stories, but
it’s actually very dark in the way it plays out. There is tragic death, an
attempted murder, an effective kidnapping, and yet it’s all just a simple
story about a man re-encountering his first unrequited love.
Secondly - and this really seems to be an absurd thing for
me to admire – this book captures purely and unequivocally the male sphere of
existence. That paradoxical lone-wolf longing for both solitude and gratifying
companionship, and that single-minded focus on control, both of self and of the
situation around you. It’s not like males need any external help to have our
voice heard in literature, but it was still remarkable and fascinating to see
how Murdoch as a woman so neatly and yet curiously captured it.
Thirdly, there's a very haunting and ethereal quality all over this. Again there's that futility of trying to control the elements which I respond to, and there's a lot of exploration of the notion of nostalgia, of what an empty, pointless pursuit it is to grasp onto the past like it can control the present.
But to really capture the essence of my enjoyment, we have
to look back at my previous two years of reading challenges, and note that TIME
and TIME again, I felt that the TIME list made questionable – if not utterly
wrong – choices in some of their books. If they need a Don DeLillo, Underworld should have been the clear
choice over White Noise. Margaret
Atwood should be a shoe-in for the list, but The Handmaid’s Tale is infinitely superior to The Blind Assassin. So when I read the Murdoch inclusion in the
list, Under the Net, I couldn’t help
but wonder why such a lightweight offering was chosen –was it simply that as
her debut, it heralded the arrival of a unique voice? Quite possibly.
But when I read this, and found it retaining the
irreverently humourous tone and peculiar characterisation of Under the Net, and yet discovering it to
be possessed of significantly more gravity and profundity, asking questions
about life and love that Under the Net wouldn’t
bother with, it gave me a wonderful sense of vindication. Again, what I’d
thought unseen would be the obvious choice, would indeed have been the better
one.
And that feeling of self-righteousness really can’t be
undervalued.
So there you have it. I hope you have enjoyed my self-indulgence while I take a little bit of a break before starting it all over again with movies.
1 Comments:
Thanks for the good read Sam and for the suggestions for my reading list for 2015. Also nice to see some of our gifts to your library being in the top 10. Will have to ask to borrow them back!
Post a Comment
<< Home